Why Banks Deduct Charges on Failed Transactions
One of the most confusing experiences for bank customers is seeing a charge deducted even when a transaction fails. Many people assume that if a transfer, ATM withdrawal, or card payment does not go through, no fee should apply. In reality, banks may still deduct charges in certain situations and this is often permitted by regulation and banking system design.
This article explains why failed transactions may still attract charges, when such charges are allowed, and what rights customers have.
What Is a Failed Transaction?
A failed transaction occurs when a banking instruction is initiated but does not complete successfully. This can happen during:
- ATM withdrawals
- Bank transfers (USSD, mobile app, internet banking)
- Card payments (POS or online)
A transaction may fail due to:
- Network errors
- Insufficient funds
- System timeouts
- Wrong details (e.g., invalid account number)
- Interbank switching issues
Even though the customer does not receive the service, banking systems may still incur processing costs.
Banks Still Incur Costs Even When Transactions Fail
One key reason charges may apply is that failed transactions are not “free” to process.
When you initiate a transaction:
Your bank’s system processes the request
The request may pass through interbank switches (e.g., NIBSS in Nigeria)
Network providers and payment processors are engaged
These systems charge banks per transaction attempt, not only per successful transaction. As a result, banks sometimes pass part of this cost to customers.
Regulatory Allowance for Failed-Transaction Charges :
In Nigeria, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) regulates what banks can and cannot charge.
Under the CBN Guide to Bank Charges
Banks may charge for customer-induced transactions, even if they fail Charges are generally linked to transaction attempts, not outcomes
Failed transactions caused by system or bank errors should not permanently disadvantage customers
This means:
If you initiate a transaction that fails due to network or third-party issues, a fee may apply
If the failure is entirely the bank’s fault, customers may be entitled to reversals or refunds.
Types of Failed Transactions That May Attract Charges
ATM Withdrawal Failures:
If an ATM attempts to dispense cash but fails due to:
- Network timeout
- Switching errors
The transaction may still pass through multiple systems before being reversed. Some banks apply a temporary charge, which is later reversed when reconciliation is completed.
USSD and Mobile App Transfer Failures : USSD and mobile transfers rely on:
- Telecom networks
- Interbank switching platforms
Even if money is not delivered to the recipient, the USSD session and processing cost has already occurred, which may justify a charge.
Insufficient Funds Failures :
If a transaction fails because your balance is insufficient:
Banks may still apply non-sufficient funds (NSF) or processing fees
This is considered a customer-initiated error
Delayed Reversals and “Later” Charges:
In some cases;
The charge is not deducted immediately
It is applied later when funds become available.
This happens because banks reconcile failed transactions in batches, and pending fees may be posted once the account has money again.
This practice often causes confusion because customers assume the issue is resolved once the transaction fails.
When Failed-Transaction Charges Should Be Refunded
Banks are generally expected to reverse charges when:
- The failure was due to a confirmed bank/system error
- Cash was not dispensed but the account was debited
- Duplicate charges occurred
- Regulatory limits were breached
Most regulators require banks to investigate disputes and refund customers where appropriate.
Why Banks Do Not Always Notify customers
Clearly Failed-transaction charges are often:
Bundled under generic descriptions like “processing fee”
Applied automatically by core banking systems
Explained only in pricing guides or terms and conditions
This lack of clarity makes customers feel unfairly charged even when the bank is acting within disclosed rules.
How Customers Can Protect Themselves To reduce or avoid charges on failed transactions:
- Ensure stable network connections before initiating transfers
- Confirm sufficient balance before transactions
- Use bank apps instead of USSD where possible
- Avoid repeating failed transactions immediately
- Monitor statements and report unresolved failures promptly
- Request reversals when failures are clearly not your fault
Key Notes
- Failed transactions still incur processing and network costs
- Banks may charge for transaction attempts, not just success
- Charges are more likely when failures are customer-induced
- Charges should be reversed when failures are due to bank/system errors
- Understanding your bank’s pricing guide reduces surprises
Conclusion
While it feels unfair to be charged for a transaction that did not succeed, banks deduct charges on failed transactions because the underlying systems and networks have already been used. These deductions are often permitted by regulation, provided they are disclosed and reasonable.
However, customers are not powerless. Disputing unjustified charges, understanding pricing rules, and choosing more reliable transaction channels can significantly reduce the impact of failed-transaction fees.
Financial literacy is the strongest defense against silent deductions.
Comments